Tuesday concept lecture, Week 4, simplified for a 50-minute hour that also holds two activities. Order: Air Force One warm-up (5 min), the Prague "Where Am I" activity (15 min), then the short explanation of how GPS does the same thing (about 25 min). Thursday is field collection on campus and the QGIS import in the Thursday hands-on session. The longer version of this material (four-step position fix, error budget arithmetic, the meters demo) is in the extended deck linked from the Day 6 page.
Set expectations: two activities first, explanation second. Students will have done trilateration with their own hands before anyone says the word. The reading is GIS Fundamentals chapter 5, GNSS and Coordinate Surveying.
Instructor setup, before class: hide the Air Force One marker somewhere in the room, mark three fixed points as satellites 1, 2, and 3 (sticky notes on a light, a door frame, the lectern corner), measure the straight-line distance from each to the marker with a tape, and write the three numbers on this slide. Today's numbers were measured in this room: 88 inches from the north projector, 175 from the south projector, 167 from the camera lens at the front. (The 2021 numbers, 169/216/151, belonged to a different room.) Re-measure whenever the room or the hiding place changes. Run it with volunteers: two or three students at the front with tape measures or string, swinging an arc from each satellite while the class calls out where the arcs cross. Let it take as long as it takes — no clock. The point: three ranges from three known points fix a position.
Bring the printed maps of Europe with a scale bar, one per student (print them beforehand; do not count on a web map). Compasses or string. Twelve to fifteen minutes. Circulate and check that they converted seconds to kilometers before drawing; the usual mistake is a circle in meters on a map scaled in kilometers. Reveal the answer only after they commit.
Check the arithmetic: 0.00237 s x 299,792 km/s = 710.5 km. Ask what a fourth station would add (a check on your own clock) and what would go wrong if all three stations were in a line (the circles meet at a shallow angle and the answer smears out). Both come back in the error slides.
Students say "GPS" for any satellite positioning; name the difference once. Everything for the rest of the hour is the same for every constellation: the satellite broadcasts a code, the receiver measures how late it arrived, and turns that into a distance.
This is the clever trick at the heart of GPS. No atomic clock needed in the receiver, only a code generator. The radio stations in the Prague problem did the same job by announcing the time.
Answer C: 0.067 x 299,792,458 = 20,086,094 m, about 20,100 km, which is the real orbit height. Same arithmetic as Prague, same arithmetic as timing a thunderclap. Point out the sensitivity: one microsecond of clock error is 300 m of position error.
This is Prague in three dimensions. Vocabulary: measuring distances is TRILATERATION; triangulation measures angles. The extended deck builds this one sphere at a time if anyone wants it.
The key sentence is the title. It is the reason converting to meters, two slides from now, is not one multiplication, and it is why QGIS asks for a CRS every time you add a layer. Datums and the geoid get their own day in Week 8.
Have a student read their current coordinates out loud in each format. Thursday's field collection asks for decimal degrees with the minus sign.
Four decimals cannot resolve a building; two cannot resolve a city block. The practical takeaway of the hour. Students copy 40.25, -111.65 into a spreadsheet and wonder why the point lands in a field.
Answer B. Seven decimal places is about a centimeter of precision; being 8 m from the truth is poor accuracy. The receiver reports every digit it computed, not the digits it can defend. On the quiz.
Do cos(40.25) = 0.763 on the board. Ask what happens at 60 degrees north (half) and at the pole (zero). Degrees for storing and sharing, projected meters for measuring; QGIS will happily hand you a meaningless number in degrees.
The atmosphere is the biggest instrument error; user error dwarfs all of it. Practical advice for Thursday: the lawn gives a better fix than the wall of the Clyde. Selective availability (deliberate military degradation, ~100 m) was switched off in May 2000, which is why the table no longer has that row.
Same range errors, different geometry. This is the "three stations in a line" question from Prague. It changes minute by minute as the constellation moves, which is why the same spot can read differently an hour later.
One idea, one slide. Work the arithmetic on the board if there is time: base knows it is at (Bx, By), satellites say (Bx+5, By-3), correction is (-5, +3), apply it to the rover. Survey-grade receivers reach centimeters this way.
Preview of Thursday. The Thursday session field collection first, then the import demo. The "GPS Class Activity" item on Learning Suite is recorded that day. Run sheet: byu-hydroinformatics.github.io/cce114-geomatics/weeks/week-04/
Confirm the Saturday due dates against Learning Suite before class.
Revision notes (2026-09-03): simplified from the 40-slide Part 1 deck at Dan's request so that Tuesday of Week 4 holds the Air Force One warm-up, the Prague activity, and a short GPS explanation in one 50-minute hour. Kept: constellations, the code-delay trick, the range quiz, ranges-to-position, angles-not-distances, coordinate formats, the decimal-place table, the precision/accuracy quiz, the lat/long-to-meters rule, a one-slide error budget, PDOP, and DGPS. Dropped or merged: the 3 D's of map data, the four-concepts roadmap, the U.S. Government framing, modulation methods, the 0.674 s worked example, the datum table, the geoid/ellipsoid slide (Week 8 covers it), the six separate error-source slides, the cumulative-error figure, the PDOP distribution figure, the DGPS post-processing and base/rover arithmetic figures, and the Tuesday campus-walk activity (now Thursday). The Air Force One and Prague slides came from the Part 2 deck, which is kept as the extended reference deck. Original sources: "GPS and Triangulation.pptx" (2025) and "GPS basics.pptx" (2024).
Five minutes, in pairs, then a show of hands on the two worth arguing about: why the fourth satellite is needed, and precision against accuracy. The coordinate questions are the ones that matter for Thursday, so do not skip past them. If the room has no signal, put the URL on the board. The page is linked from the Week 4 page too.